Before this year, no one in America had heard of Dylan Mulvaney, a biological man pretending to be a woman. Now he is suddenly in the news.
The reason behind their sudden emergence is chilling. The New York Post exclusively revealed that the Human Rights Campaign, a front for the left-wing LGBTQ mafia, is using the Social Credit Score to force companies like Nike and Anheuser-Busch to push their toxic agenda.
These are exactly the tactics that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) pulls with its citizens and companies whenever they say or do something against the CCP’s mission.
In addition, the HRC publicly threatens organizations every year by personally sending a list of demands they wish to publicly demonstrate. Apparently, Mulvaney was part of those marching orders.
HRC is backed by hedge funds such as BlackRock and Vanguard, the top shareholders of most American publicly-traded corporations. Failure to advance the awakened agenda will cause these companies to pull their money from Nike, Anheuser-Busch, and other major companies, resulting in millions of dollars in losses.
All of this means that major corporations actually have more to lose by not embracing the awakened left than by angering conservatives. So much for the slogan, “Wake up, be broken.”
The New York Post reported:
An executive at companies like Nike, Anheuser-Busch and Kate Spade, whose brand endorsements have turned controversial trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney into today’s woke “It Girl,” not just a virtue symbol.
They’re handing out lucrative deals to what were once considered fringe celebrities because they have to — or risk failing the all-important social credit score that can make or break their businesses.
At risk is their Corporate Equality Index – or CEI – score, which is monitored by the Human Rights Campaign, the world’s largest LGBTQ+ political lobby group.
HRC, which receives millions from George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, issues report cards to America’s biggest corporations through the CEI: giving or deducting points for how well companies adhere to what HRC calls its “rating criteria.”
HRC lists five key rating criteria, each with its own lengthy subsections, for companies to earn or lose CEI points. The main categories are: “Workforce Protections,” “Inclusive Benefits,” “Supporting an Inclusive Culture,” “Corporate Social Responsibility and Responsible Citizenship.”
Credit: New York Post
A company can lose CEI points if it doesn’t meet the HRC’s demand for “intersectional integration in professional development, skills-based or other training” or if it doesn’t “use a supplier diversity program with a demonstrated effort to include certified LGBTQ+ suppliers . . .”
Political podcaster James Lindsey, who runs the site New Discourse, told The Post that the Human Rights Campaign treats the CEI ranking as “an extortion racket, like the Mafia.”
It doesn’t just sit idle. HRC sends representatives to organizations every year to tell them what kind of content should be visible in the company. They give them a list of demands and threaten that you won’t keep your CEI score if they don’t comply.
As a result, some American CEOs are more concerned with pleasing BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street banks — who are among the top shareholders of most American publicly-traded corporations (including Nike, Anheuser-Busch, and Kate Spade) — than they are annoying. conservatives, several sources told The Post.
“Large fund managers like BlackRock embrace this ESG orthodoxy and how they apply pressure to top corporate management teams and boards, and they often decide executive compensation and bonuses, and get re-elected or re-appointed to boards,” said a Republican running for president and “Woke Inc.: Businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, author of Inside America’s Social Justice Scam, told The Post. “They can make it very difficult for you if you don’t adhere to their agendas.”
In 2018, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, who oversees $8.6 trillion in assets and is called the “face of ESG,” wrote a now-infamous letter to CEOs titled “A Sense of Purpose” that pushed for a “new model of governance.” Line with ESG values.
“Society is demanding that public and private companies serve a social purpose,” Fink wrote. “To prosper over time, every company must not only deliver financial performance, but also show how it makes a positive contribution to society.”
“If a company doesn’t engage with the community and have a sense of purpose,” Fink notes, “it will eventually lose its license to operate from key stakeholders.”
